<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1991 (2) TMI 228 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=81065</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the company&#039;s appeals by remanding the issues of turnover bonus and commission to selling agents for re-examination by the Assistant Collector. The Tribunal dismissed the appeals filed by Revenue, upholding the Collector (Appeals) decisions regarding the cost of wooden crates, hoops, and nails, and the various trade discounts and rebates.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2011 12:05:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=118210" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1991 (2) TMI 228 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=81065</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the company&#039;s appeals by remanding the issues of turnover bonus and commission to selling agents for re-examination by the Assistant Collector. The Tribunal dismissed the appeals filed by Revenue, upholding the Collector (Appeals) decisions regarding the cost of wooden crates, hoops, and nails, and the various trade discounts and rebates.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=81065</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>