<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1990 (12) TMI 229 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=81045</link>
    <description>Where tariff entries contain specific definitions, iron and steel products must be classified by their essential statutory characteristics rather than by the identity of the mill or isolated dimensional limits. Products with uneven thickness and width, lacking controlled contour and the defined features of hoops, strips, flats or flat rolled products, were treated as bars before 01-03-1988 and as other bars and rods under the revised Chapter 72 thereafter. Goods of thickness below 3 mm and width above 75 mm were not classifiable as strips merely because of dimensions, since the strip definition also required rolled, rectangular cross-section and coil form characteristics.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2011 10:31:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=118190" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1990 (12) TMI 229 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=81045</link>
      <description>Where tariff entries contain specific definitions, iron and steel products must be classified by their essential statutory characteristics rather than by the identity of the mill or isolated dimensional limits. Products with uneven thickness and width, lacking controlled contour and the defined features of hoops, strips, flats or flat rolled products, were treated as bars before 01-03-1988 and as other bars and rods under the revised Chapter 72 thereafter. Goods of thickness below 3 mm and width above 75 mm were not classifiable as strips merely because of dimensions, since the strip definition also required rolled, rectangular cross-section and coil form characteristics.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=81045</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>