<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1990 (12) TMI 227 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=81041</link>
    <description>Deemed Modvat credit on inputs covered by conditional exemption notifications was held admissible where the department failed to prove that the goods were actually cleared from a non-duty-paid stream. The Tribunal applied its earlier coordinate-bench view that conditional exemption does not, by itself, make inputs non-duty-paid, and that a factual enquiry is required before credit can be denied. A contrary Regional Bench order was not treated as sufficient to override the settled line of decisions, and a later amendment to the Ministry&#039;s order was held inapplicable to the period in dispute. The orders allowing deemed credit were sustained and the departmental appeals failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2011 10:24:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=118186" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1990 (12) TMI 227 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=81041</link>
      <description>Deemed Modvat credit on inputs covered by conditional exemption notifications was held admissible where the department failed to prove that the goods were actually cleared from a non-duty-paid stream. The Tribunal applied its earlier coordinate-bench view that conditional exemption does not, by itself, make inputs non-duty-paid, and that a factual enquiry is required before credit can be denied. A contrary Regional Bench order was not treated as sufficient to override the settled line of decisions, and a later amendment to the Ministry&#039;s order was held inapplicable to the period in dispute. The orders allowing deemed credit were sustained and the departmental appeals failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=81041</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>