https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=81040 The Tribunal granted a stay in the case involving the classification of glass fabrics impregnated with bitumen/coal tar pitch. The Assistant Collector's reevaluation, extending beyond the remand order, was deemed inappropriate. The petitioner's argument that the product should be classified under Heading 7014.00 as glass fabric rather than sub-heading 6807.00 as an article of bitumen was supported. The Tribunal found the reliance on HSN provisions for classification improper and instructed the appeal to be transferred to a Special Bench for resolution, with the petitioner required to execute a personal bond for the disputed amount. en-us Wed, 19 Dec 1990 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 22 Jun 2011 10:23:12 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=81040 The Tribunal granted a stay in the case involving the classification of glass fabrics impregnated with bitumen/coal tar pitch. The Assistant Collector's reevaluation, extending beyond the remand order, was deemed inappropriate. The petitioner's argument that the product should be classified under Heading 7014.00 as glass fabric rather than sub-heading 6807.00 as an article of bitumen was supported. The Tribunal found the reliance on HSN provisions for classification improper and instructed the appeal to be transferred to a Special Bench for resolution, with the petitioner required to execute a personal bond for the disputed amount. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 19 Dec 1990 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=81040