<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1990 (11) TMI 259 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=81019</link>
    <description>Separate incorporated units could not have their clearances clubbed for exemption under Notification No. 175/86-C.E. absent concrete evidence that one manufactured or cleared goods on behalf of the other; common management or related directors was insufficient. Excess container hire charges were includible to the extent they exceeded the actual cost of durable returnable containers, as that surplus formed part of value. Compensation for short lifting of contracted crates was not part of assessable value because it was a payment for contractual default, not the price of the goods. Transportation charges for returning empty crates and bottles were also excluded as post-manufacturing ancillary costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 22 Nov 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Jun 2011 18:17:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=118164" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1990 (11) TMI 259 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=81019</link>
      <description>Separate incorporated units could not have their clearances clubbed for exemption under Notification No. 175/86-C.E. absent concrete evidence that one manufactured or cleared goods on behalf of the other; common management or related directors was insufficient. Excess container hire charges were includible to the extent they exceeded the actual cost of durable returnable containers, as that surplus formed part of value. Compensation for short lifting of contracted crates was not part of assessable value because it was a payment for contractual default, not the price of the goods. Transportation charges for returning empty crates and bottles were also excluded as post-manufacturing ancillary costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Nov 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=81019</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>