<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1990 (12) TMI 216 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80981</link>
    <description>Preventive detention may be subjected to judicial review before execution only in exceptional cases, such as lack of authority, mistaken identity, improper purpose, or facially vague or extraneous grounds. The constitutional scheme and detention law do not give a proposed detenu an independent right to obtain the detention order, grounds, or supporting documents in advance to mount a pre-execution challenge. Where the proposed detenu is absconding, disclosure will not be compelled merely because a relative seeks the materials on his behalf. Pre-execution interference is therefore narrow, and directions requiring pre-surrender supply of the detention papers were beyond the permissible scope of review.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 Jul 2014 12:11:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=118126" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1990 (12) TMI 216 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80981</link>
      <description>Preventive detention may be subjected to judicial review before execution only in exceptional cases, such as lack of authority, mistaken identity, improper purpose, or facially vague or extraneous grounds. The constitutional scheme and detention law do not give a proposed detenu an independent right to obtain the detention order, grounds, or supporting documents in advance to mount a pre-execution challenge. Where the proposed detenu is absconding, disclosure will not be compelled merely because a relative seeks the materials on his behalf. Pre-execution interference is therefore narrow, and directions requiring pre-surrender supply of the detention papers were beyond the permissible scope of review.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>FEMA</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80981</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>