https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80976 The Tribunal rejected the Rectification of Mistake (ROM) application, finding no mistake apparent from the record. It held that all arguments were duly considered in the order, citing legal precedents that elaborate arguments do not constitute a reviewable error. The Tribunal emphasized its limited power to correct mistakes and reiterated that it lacks the authority to review its own order, as supported by legal principles and precedents. en-us Tue, 18 Dec 1990 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 21 Jun 2011 16:16:26 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80976 The Tribunal rejected the Rectification of Mistake (ROM) application, finding no mistake apparent from the record. It held that all arguments were duly considered in the order, citing legal precedents that elaborate arguments do not constitute a reviewable error. The Tribunal emphasized its limited power to correct mistakes and reiterated that it lacks the authority to review its own order, as supported by legal principles and precedents. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 18 Dec 1990 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80976