<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1990 (12) TMI 209 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80974</link>
    <description>The appeal of M/s. Elpro International was remanded to the Collector for fresh consideration regarding the issues of related person/agent and whether the X-ray equipment is excisable. The appeal filed by M/s. I.G.E. (India) Ltd. was allowed, setting aside the Collector&#039;s order against them. The Collector&#039;s findings that M/s. I.G.E. is the manufacturer of the complete X-ray system and liable to pay duty on the entire X-ray system were deemed to go beyond the original show cause notice and were not upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Jun 2011 16:11:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=118119" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1990 (12) TMI 209 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80974</link>
      <description>The appeal of M/s. Elpro International was remanded to the Collector for fresh consideration regarding the issues of related person/agent and whether the X-ray equipment is excisable. The appeal filed by M/s. I.G.E. (India) Ltd. was allowed, setting aside the Collector&#039;s order against them. The Collector&#039;s findings that M/s. I.G.E. is the manufacturer of the complete X-ray system and liable to pay duty on the entire X-ray system were deemed to go beyond the original show cause notice and were not upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80974</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>