<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1990 (10) TMI 202 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80922</link>
    <description>Stay of the impugned order was granted pending appeal because the appellants showed a prima facie case that no fresh declaration was required after rescission of the earlier notification and issuance of a similar one. Their conduct was treated as consistent with a bona fide belief, reinforced by the departmental clarification on the declaration requirement. The Tribunal confined its view to the stay stage and left the legal effect of the clarification, and the requirement for a fresh declaration, for final determination in the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Jun 2011 12:37:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=118067" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1990 (10) TMI 202 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80922</link>
      <description>Stay of the impugned order was granted pending appeal because the appellants showed a prima facie case that no fresh declaration was required after rescission of the earlier notification and issuance of a similar one. Their conduct was treated as consistent with a bona fide belief, reinforced by the departmental clarification on the declaration requirement. The Tribunal confined its view to the stay stage and left the legal effect of the clarification, and the requirement for a fresh declaration, for final determination in the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80922</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>