<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1990 (10) TMI 189 - CEGAT, BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80908</link>
    <description>The appeal was directed against the order of the Collector of Customs, Air Port, Bombay, which confiscated orthopaedic appliances valued at Rs. 2,69,442 but allowed re-shipment on payment of a fine of Rs. 60,000. The Tribunal found that the appellants had proactively addressed the issue with the suppliers before filing the Bill of Entry, concluding that the imposition of the fine was unjustified. The appeal was allowed, setting aside the fine and granting relief to the appellants.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Jun 2011 12:03:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=118053" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1990 (10) TMI 189 - CEGAT, BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80908</link>
      <description>The appeal was directed against the order of the Collector of Customs, Air Port, Bombay, which confiscated orthopaedic appliances valued at Rs. 2,69,442 but allowed re-shipment on payment of a fine of Rs. 60,000. The Tribunal found that the appellants had proactively addressed the issue with the suppliers before filing the Bill of Entry, concluding that the imposition of the fine was unjustified. The appeal was allowed, setting aside the fine and granting relief to the appellants.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80908</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>