<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1990 (9) TMI 185 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80896</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal against the order of the Additional Collector, Indore, due to the lack of proper observance of natural justice. The appellant&#039;s denial of involvement in smuggling, the failure to produce key witnesses for cross-examination, and the imposition of liability based on assumption without concrete evidence led to the decision to confiscate watches and impose a penalty being overturned. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of establishing a direct connection and proof beyond suspicion to justify penalties, ultimately granting relief to the legal representative of the deceased appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Jun 2011 11:43:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=118041" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1990 (9) TMI 185 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80896</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal against the order of the Additional Collector, Indore, due to the lack of proper observance of natural justice. The appellant&#039;s denial of involvement in smuggling, the failure to produce key witnesses for cross-examination, and the imposition of liability based on assumption without concrete evidence led to the decision to confiscate watches and impose a penalty being overturned. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of establishing a direct connection and proof beyond suspicion to justify penalties, ultimately granting relief to the legal representative of the deceased appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80896</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>