<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1990 (10) TMI 187 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80895</link>
    <description>Demurrage charges were treated as a disputed component of customs assessable value under the Customs Valuation Rules, 1988, with the Tribunal noting that such charges arise only when the importer cannot clear goods in time. It held at the stay stage that includibility should be determined at final hearing and that an earlier Tribunal view supported non-inclusion. On that basis, pre-deposit of the demanded duty was waived and recovery was stayed pending disposal of the proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Jun 2011 11:42:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=118040" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1990 (10) TMI 187 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80895</link>
      <description>Demurrage charges were treated as a disputed component of customs assessable value under the Customs Valuation Rules, 1988, with the Tribunal noting that such charges arise only when the importer cannot clear goods in time. It held at the stay stage that includibility should be determined at final hearing and that an earlier Tribunal view supported non-inclusion. On that basis, pre-deposit of the demanded duty was waived and recovery was stayed pending disposal of the proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80895</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>