https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80892 Preventive detention may be sustained against a detenu already in custody if the detaining authority is aware of the custody, notes rejection of bail, and records a rational basis to expect release on bail and future prejudicial activity. The order is not vitiated merely because other detention orders were quashed on facts involving a truncated medical report, where the present detention rests on separate and independent material. Delay in service of the declaration under section 10(1), and delay in disposal of the representation, does not invalidate detention where the statutory period for making the declaration was met, the delay is explained, and the detenu's effective right of representation is not shown to have been impaired. en-us Thu, 12 Jul 1990 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 01 Jun 2017 12:22:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80892 Preventive detention may be sustained against a detenu already in custody if the detaining authority is aware of the custody, notes rejection of bail, and records a rational basis to expect release on bail and future prejudicial activity. The order is not vitiated merely because other detention orders were quashed on facts involving a truncated medical report, where the present detention rests on separate and independent material. Delay in service of the declaration under section 10(1), and delay in disposal of the representation, does not invalidate detention where the statutory period for making the declaration was met, the delay is explained, and the detenu's effective right of representation is not shown to have been impaired. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 12 Jul 1990 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80892