<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1990 (9) TMI 181 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80889</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal challenging an interim order that allowed redemption of goods upon payment of a fine, despite being titled as interim. It found that the order functioned as a final decision by confiscating goods and imposing a redemption fine prematurely. The Tribunal emphasized the need for procedural adherence and fairness in customs adjudication processes, criticizing the premature actions of the Additional Collector and suggesting a focus on concluding proceedings before issuing final orders.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 08 Sep 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Jun 2011 11:23:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=118034" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1990 (9) TMI 181 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80889</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal challenging an interim order that allowed redemption of goods upon payment of a fine, despite being titled as interim. It found that the order functioned as a final decision by confiscating goods and imposing a redemption fine prematurely. The Tribunal emphasized the need for procedural adherence and fairness in customs adjudication processes, criticizing the premature actions of the Additional Collector and suggesting a focus on concluding proceedings before issuing final orders.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 08 Sep 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80889</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>