<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1990 (7) TMI 250 - HIGH COURT CALCUTTA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80885</link>
    <description>Import controls limiting woollen rags, synthetic rags and shoddy wool to specified entry ports may be imposed under Section 3 of the Imports and Exports (Control) Act, 1947 where they regulate, rather than prohibit, imports. Restricting entry points to prevent serviceable garments being imported as rags was treated as a measure within the Central Government&#039;s broad power to prescribe conditions for effective import control and administrative feasibility. The port-based classification had a rational connection with preventing misuse of the import policy, defeating the Article 14 challenge. It was also a reasonable regulatory restriction rather than a hostile barrier to trade under Article 301.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Aug 2011 16:16:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=118030" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1990 (7) TMI 250 - HIGH COURT CALCUTTA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80885</link>
      <description>Import controls limiting woollen rags, synthetic rags and shoddy wool to specified entry ports may be imposed under Section 3 of the Imports and Exports (Control) Act, 1947 where they regulate, rather than prohibit, imports. Restricting entry points to prevent serviceable garments being imported as rags was treated as a measure within the Central Government&#039;s broad power to prescribe conditions for effective import control and administrative feasibility. The port-based classification had a rational connection with preventing misuse of the import policy, defeating the Article 14 challenge. It was also a reasonable regulatory restriction rather than a hostile barrier to trade under Article 301.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80885</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>