https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80881 A partner already recognised under Rule 40(1) of the Bombay Foreign Liquor Rules, 1953 cannot be denied continuation of licensed privileges on the original licensee's death merely because he is not an heir, legal representative, or assignee. Once the Collector has accepted the partnership and amended the licence to include the partner's name, that person holds a recognised partnership status rather than that of a fresh applicant. The licensing condition invoked by the authority did not apply to a surviving partner's claim, and the refusal based only on the absence of a family or representative link to the deceased licensee was unsustainable. The deceased partner's name was therefore liable to be deleted while the surviving partner continued the licence. en-us Mon, 08 Oct 1990 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 20 Jun 2011 18:52:55 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80881 A partner already recognised under Rule 40(1) of the Bombay Foreign Liquor Rules, 1953 cannot be denied continuation of licensed privileges on the original licensee's death merely because he is not an heir, legal representative, or assignee. Once the Collector has accepted the partnership and amended the licence to include the partner's name, that person holds a recognised partnership status rather than that of a fresh applicant. The licensing condition invoked by the authority did not apply to a surviving partner's claim, and the refusal based only on the absence of a family or representative link to the deceased licensee was unsustainable. The deceased partner's name was therefore liable to be deleted while the surviving partner continued the licence. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 08 Oct 1990 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80881