<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1990 (10) TMI 185 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80880</link>
    <description>The goods were classified under heading 3506.10/3506.91 of the Customs Tariff Act, making them eligible for the benefits of Customs Notification No. 136/86. The test report from M/s. Italab (P) Ltd. was deemed reliable, and the lower authorities were faulted for not issuing a speaking order. The Collector&#039;s decision was upheld, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Jun 2011 18:48:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=118025" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1990 (10) TMI 185 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80880</link>
      <description>The goods were classified under heading 3506.10/3506.91 of the Customs Tariff Act, making them eligible for the benefits of Customs Notification No. 136/86. The test report from M/s. Italab (P) Ltd. was deemed reliable, and the lower authorities were faulted for not issuing a speaking order. The Collector&#039;s decision was upheld, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80880</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>