<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1990 (11) TMI 225 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80877</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeals, ruling that wet dates packed in cartons were not eligible for the concessional rate of duty under Customs Notification No. 141 of 1979. The Tribunal emphasized that the Notification specified certain modes of packing, excluding cartons, and rejected the appellants&#039; argument that &quot;bags&quot; and &quot;baskets&quot; could encompass cartons based on dictionary definitions. Citing precedent, the Tribunal held that terms not explicitly mentioned in a statute or notification cannot be implied. Therefore, the appellants&#039; appeals were dismissed, upholding the Customs authorities&#039; decision to levy higher duties on wet dates packed in cartons.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Jun 2011 18:36:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=118022" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1990 (11) TMI 225 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80877</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeals, ruling that wet dates packed in cartons were not eligible for the concessional rate of duty under Customs Notification No. 141 of 1979. The Tribunal emphasized that the Notification specified certain modes of packing, excluding cartons, and rejected the appellants&#039; argument that &quot;bags&quot; and &quot;baskets&quot; could encompass cartons based on dictionary definitions. Citing precedent, the Tribunal held that terms not explicitly mentioned in a statute or notification cannot be implied. Therefore, the appellants&#039; appeals were dismissed, upholding the Customs authorities&#039; decision to levy higher duties on wet dates packed in cartons.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80877</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>