<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1990 (10) TMI 174 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80859</link>
    <description>Waiver of pre-deposit on account of the appellants&#039; financial hardship was treated as operating as a stay against recovery pending appeal, so recovery of the disputed customs dues was restrained. The relief was made conditional on the appellants not alienating or disposing of their fixed assets, including plant and machinery, and the appeal was directed to be heard out of turn.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Jun 2011 17:59:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=118004" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1990 (10) TMI 174 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80859</link>
      <description>Waiver of pre-deposit on account of the appellants&#039; financial hardship was treated as operating as a stay against recovery pending appeal, so recovery of the disputed customs dues was restrained. The relief was made conditional on the appellants not alienating or disposing of their fixed assets, including plant and machinery, and the appeal was directed to be heard out of turn.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80859</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>