<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1990 (8) TMI 276 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80836</link>
    <description>The Tribunal modified the stay order for an appellant facing financial difficulties, considering compliance efforts, the interpretation of a retrospective exemption notification, and the application of Section 11C of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944. The Tribunal dispensed with the redeposit of the balance duty and penalty amounts during the appeal&#039;s pendency, reflecting a comprehensive analysis of legal principles and precedents.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Jun 2011 16:30:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=117981" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1990 (8) TMI 276 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80836</link>
      <description>The Tribunal modified the stay order for an appellant facing financial difficulties, considering compliance efforts, the interpretation of a retrospective exemption notification, and the application of Section 11C of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944. The Tribunal dispensed with the redeposit of the balance duty and penalty amounts during the appeal&#039;s pendency, reflecting a comprehensive analysis of legal principles and precedents.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80836</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>