https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80809 The court corrected an order issued without all members' signatures, leading to a decision correction after notices to both sides. The material was classified as synthetic waste, resulting in the appeal rejection. The issue of classification and assessment for additional duty was remanded for reconsideration. A dissenting member disagreed on the classification of the impugned product for C.V. duty levy, while the majority upheld the classification as synthetic waste. The judgment emphasized confining proceedings within the remand order's ambit and remanded the matter for proper classification assessment and further submissions. en-us Mon, 16 Jul 1990 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 20 Jun 2011 15:24:45 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80809 The court corrected an order issued without all members' signatures, leading to a decision correction after notices to both sides. The material was classified as synthetic waste, resulting in the appeal rejection. The issue of classification and assessment for additional duty was remanded for reconsideration. A dissenting member disagreed on the classification of the impugned product for C.V. duty levy, while the majority upheld the classification as synthetic waste. The judgment emphasized confining proceedings within the remand order's ambit and remanded the matter for proper classification assessment and further submissions. Case-Laws Customs Mon, 16 Jul 1990 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80809