https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80806 The Tribunal allowed the appeal filed by a Public Limited Company against the Collector of Central Excise's orders, confirming a demand of Rs. 1,75,552.74 due to a discrepancy in the quantity of imported LAM Coke. The appellant's argument that the loss in weight was due to evaporation of water content, falling under Section 23 of the Customs Act, was accepted. The Tribunal found no evidence of pilferage or clandestine removal, setting aside the Collector's order and granting the appellant consequential reliefs. en-us Tue, 26 Jun 1990 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 20 Jun 2011 15:12:59 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80806 The Tribunal allowed the appeal filed by a Public Limited Company against the Collector of Central Excise's orders, confirming a demand of Rs. 1,75,552.74 due to a discrepancy in the quantity of imported LAM Coke. The appellant's argument that the loss in weight was due to evaporation of water content, falling under Section 23 of the Customs Act, was accepted. The Tribunal found no evidence of pilferage or clandestine removal, setting aside the Collector's order and granting the appellant consequential reliefs. Case-Laws Customs Tue, 26 Jun 1990 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80806