<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1990 (6) TMI 179 - CEGAT, BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80803</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CEGAT, Bombay allowed two appeals challenging the imposition of personal penalties on two appellants for smuggling Vitamin B-12 powder. The tribunal found that there was insufficient evidence to establish the direct or indirect involvement of the appellants in the smuggling activity. The penalties imposed under Sec. 112(b) of the Customs Act were deemed unjustified due to the lack of a clear nexus between the accused and the seized goods. As a result, the penalties on both appellants were set aside, emphasizing the necessity of unequivocal involvement in smuggling activities to impose penalties under the Customs Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Jun 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Jun 2011 15:03:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=117948" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1990 (6) TMI 179 - CEGAT, BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80803</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CEGAT, Bombay allowed two appeals challenging the imposition of personal penalties on two appellants for smuggling Vitamin B-12 powder. The tribunal found that there was insufficient evidence to establish the direct or indirect involvement of the appellants in the smuggling activity. The penalties imposed under Sec. 112(b) of the Customs Act were deemed unjustified due to the lack of a clear nexus between the accused and the seized goods. As a result, the penalties on both appellants were set aside, emphasizing the necessity of unequivocal involvement in smuggling activities to impose penalties under the Customs Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Jun 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80803</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>