<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1990 (10) TMI 170 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80780</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the classification of the &quot;HSK-4 Electric Resistance Wire&quot; under Chapter Heading 73.15 (1) and dismissed the appeals filed by the Revenue. The decision was based on the aluminum content exceeding ISI specifications for stainless steel wire, leading to the wire being classified under Heading 73.15 (1). Appeals for condonation of delay were allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Jun 2011 13:00:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=117926" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1990 (10) TMI 170 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80780</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the classification of the &quot;HSK-4 Electric Resistance Wire&quot; under Chapter Heading 73.15 (1) and dismissed the appeals filed by the Revenue. The decision was based on the aluminum content exceeding ISI specifications for stainless steel wire, leading to the wire being classified under Heading 73.15 (1). Appeals for condonation of delay were allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80780</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>