<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1990 (9) TMI 155 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80773</link>
    <description>Waiver of pre-deposit under section 35F of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944 depends on a combined assessment of prima facie merits, financial hardship, liquidity and balance of convenience. The Tribunal found arguable issues on the merits but held that the applicants&#039; financial position was sound, relying on profitability, turnover, cash and bank balances, and sundry debtors. It therefore moulded interim relief differently for the applicants: the principal applicant was required to deposit the duty amount, though penalty pre-deposit was waived, while the penalties of the sister concerns were fully waived and recovery stayed during the appeals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sun, 09 Sep 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Jun 2011 12:35:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=117919" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1990 (9) TMI 155 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80773</link>
      <description>Waiver of pre-deposit under section 35F of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944 depends on a combined assessment of prima facie merits, financial hardship, liquidity and balance of convenience. The Tribunal found arguable issues on the merits but held that the applicants&#039; financial position was sound, relying on profitability, turnover, cash and bank balances, and sundry debtors. It therefore moulded interim relief differently for the applicants: the principal applicant was required to deposit the duty amount, though penalty pre-deposit was waived, while the penalties of the sister concerns were fully waived and recovery stayed during the appeals.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Sun, 09 Sep 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80773</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>