<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1990 (6) TMI 171 - CEGAT, CALCUTTA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80738</link>
    <description>The appeal was dismissed as the appellant was not considered a Government entity or an individual under the Customs Act. The limitation period for claiming a refund starts from the date of payment of duty, not from the Assistant Collector&#039;s intimation. The Tribunal upheld lower authorities&#039; orders, ruling the refund claim was time-barred.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Jun 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Jun 2011 18:42:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=117884" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1990 (6) TMI 171 - CEGAT, CALCUTTA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80738</link>
      <description>The appeal was dismissed as the appellant was not considered a Government entity or an individual under the Customs Act. The limitation period for claiming a refund starts from the date of payment of duty, not from the Assistant Collector&#039;s intimation. The Tribunal upheld lower authorities&#039; orders, ruling the refund claim was time-barred.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Jun 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80738</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>