<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1990 (6) TMI 170 - CEGAT, CALCUTTA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80737</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, ruling that the appellant is not a Government entity, therefore the one-year limitation period does not apply. Additionally, the appellant is not considered an individual, and as the imported goods were not for personal use but for testing purposes, the six-month limitation period is applicable. The Tribunal held that the limitation period commences from the date of duty payment, not from the date of the Assistant Collector&#039;s intimation, as the duty payment was deemed final.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Jun 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Jun 2011 18:42:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=117883" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1990 (6) TMI 170 - CEGAT, CALCUTTA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80737</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, ruling that the appellant is not a Government entity, therefore the one-year limitation period does not apply. Additionally, the appellant is not considered an individual, and as the imported goods were not for personal use but for testing purposes, the six-month limitation period is applicable. The Tribunal held that the limitation period commences from the date of duty payment, not from the date of the Assistant Collector&#039;s intimation, as the duty payment was deemed final.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Jun 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80737</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>