<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1990 (6) TMI 168 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80735</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the lower authorities&#039; decision, dismissing the appeal and ruling that the duty rate prevailing on the date of entry inward to the vessel, 2-3-1982, should apply for imported goods. The judgment clarified the significance of the date of entry inward in determining the applicable duty rate under the Customs Act, in line with legal precedents from the Supreme Court and High Courts.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 Jun 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Jun 2011 18:34:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=117881" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1990 (6) TMI 168 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80735</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the lower authorities&#039; decision, dismissing the appeal and ruling that the duty rate prevailing on the date of entry inward to the vessel, 2-3-1982, should apply for imported goods. The judgment clarified the significance of the date of entry inward in determining the applicable duty rate under the Customs Act, in line with legal precedents from the Supreme Court and High Courts.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Jun 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80735</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>