<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1990 (5) TMI 155 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80729</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Collector&#039;s decision to confiscate imported goods and impose a redemption fine due to the absence of a firm contract as per the Import Policy. A personal penalty was also upheld for non-compliance with import policy conditions. The Tribunal ruled that the assessment of duty without the benefit of a specific notification was justified, as the contract terms were found to be non-binding and subject to change. The appeal was dismissed, affirming all aspects of the Collector&#039;s order based on the lack of a firm contract.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 02 May 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Jun 2011 18:06:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=117875" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1990 (5) TMI 155 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80729</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Collector&#039;s decision to confiscate imported goods and impose a redemption fine due to the absence of a firm contract as per the Import Policy. A personal penalty was also upheld for non-compliance with import policy conditions. The Tribunal ruled that the assessment of duty without the benefit of a specific notification was justified, as the contract terms were found to be non-binding and subject to change. The appeal was dismissed, affirming all aspects of the Collector&#039;s order based on the lack of a firm contract.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 May 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80729</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>