<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1990 (7) TMI 220 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80708</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the classification of the product under Heading 35.06 post 10-2-1987. For the period before this date, the product was classified under sub-heading 3501.90. The demand for differential duty for the period 1-11-1986 to 9-2-1987 was upheld as per the President&#039;s order. The appeal was dismissed in accordance with the final order dated 21-5-1990.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Jun 2011 16:44:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=117854" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1990 (7) TMI 220 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80708</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the classification of the product under Heading 35.06 post 10-2-1987. For the period before this date, the product was classified under sub-heading 3501.90. The demand for differential duty for the period 1-11-1986 to 9-2-1987 was upheld as per the President&#039;s order. The appeal was dismissed in accordance with the final order dated 21-5-1990.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80708</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>