https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80695 A review application under the excise statute was treated as a separate statutory remedy and not barred merely because an appellate remedy was also available. Limitation for the review was computed from the date the order was issued, not merely from the date it was internally passed, so the applications were within time. Price-list approvals were found unsustainable because the Assistant Collector modified them without notice or a personal hearing, contrary to the procedural rule and the principles of natural justice, and the matter was remitted for fresh decision after due hearing. en-us Mon, 09 Jul 1990 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 18 Jun 2011 15:59:35 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80695 A review application under the excise statute was treated as a separate statutory remedy and not barred merely because an appellate remedy was also available. Limitation for the review was computed from the date the order was issued, not merely from the date it was internally passed, so the applications were within time. Price-list approvals were found unsustainable because the Assistant Collector modified them without notice or a personal hearing, contrary to the procedural rule and the principles of natural justice, and the matter was remitted for fresh decision after due hearing. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 09 Jul 1990 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80695