<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1990 (7) TMI 205 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80693</link>
    <description>The appeal was dismissed with modifications. The Tribunal confirmed that the installed capacity exceeded 2,000 metric tonnes per annum, making the appellants ineligible for the 75% concessional duty. The extended period of limitation was applicable due to suppression of facts. The matter of differential duty computation was remanded to the Collector, and the penalty was reduced to Rs. 4 lakhs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Jun 2011 15:50:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=117839" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1990 (7) TMI 205 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80693</link>
      <description>The appeal was dismissed with modifications. The Tribunal confirmed that the installed capacity exceeded 2,000 metric tonnes per annum, making the appellants ineligible for the 75% concessional duty. The extended period of limitation was applicable due to suppression of facts. The matter of differential duty computation was remanded to the Collector, and the penalty was reduced to Rs. 4 lakhs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80693</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>