<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1990 (6) TMI 156 - CEGAT  NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80683</link>
    <description>A beneficial exemption notification does not operate retrospectively merely because it is advantageous to taxpayers. Subordinate legislation can apply to past clearances only if the enabling statute authorises retrospective operation by express words or necessary implication. On that reasoning, Notification No. 130/83-C.E. was treated as prospective only, so it did not cover sugar clearances made before its issue and the refund claim for earlier clearances was not sustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Jun 2011 15:24:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=117829" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1990 (6) TMI 156 - CEGAT  NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80683</link>
      <description>A beneficial exemption notification does not operate retrospectively merely because it is advantageous to taxpayers. Subordinate legislation can apply to past clearances only if the enabling statute authorises retrospective operation by express words or necessary implication. On that reasoning, Notification No. 130/83-C.E. was treated as prospective only, so it did not cover sugar clearances made before its issue and the refund claim for earlier clearances was not sustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80683</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>