<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1990 (5) TMI 138 - CEGAT, MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80654</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the penalty imposed under Section 112 of the Customs Act, 1962 for transferring a foreign color T.V. camera to a Race Club. It clarified that the absence of a specific sub-clause in the show cause notice did not invalidate the order. The Tribunal reduced the penalty to Rs. 1,000 based on the appellant&#039;s belief that the camera would benefit the Club. The appeal was dismissed, except for the modified penalty amount.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 May 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Jun 2011 12:40:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=117800" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1990 (5) TMI 138 - CEGAT, MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80654</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the penalty imposed under Section 112 of the Customs Act, 1962 for transferring a foreign color T.V. camera to a Race Club. It clarified that the absence of a specific sub-clause in the show cause notice did not invalidate the order. The Tribunal reduced the penalty to Rs. 1,000 based on the appellant&#039;s belief that the camera would benefit the Club. The appeal was dismissed, except for the modified penalty amount.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 May 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80654</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>