<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1990 (5) TMI 136 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80652</link>
    <description>The appeal challenging the confiscation of imported Video Cassette mould under Section 111(d) of the Customs Act was rejected. The Judge upheld the confiscation due to the importer not being registered at the time of shipment as required by the Import &amp;amp; Export Policy. The redemption fine was reduced from Rs. 30,000 to Rs. 15,000, considering the circumstances of the case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 May 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Jun 2011 12:37:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=117798" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1990 (5) TMI 136 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80652</link>
      <description>The appeal challenging the confiscation of imported Video Cassette mould under Section 111(d) of the Customs Act was rejected. The Judge upheld the confiscation due to the importer not being registered at the time of shipment as required by the Import &amp;amp; Export Policy. The redemption fine was reduced from Rs. 30,000 to Rs. 15,000, considering the circumstances of the case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 May 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80652</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>