<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1990 (5) TMI 126 - CEGAT, BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80642</link>
    <description>Excisable molasses that had solidified in storage and were claimed to be unfit for marketing or consumption had to be examined under the full excise rule, not only the proviso dealing with loss or destruction by natural causes or unavoidable accident. The rule also contained a separate proviso enabling the proper officer to decline duty where goods are unfit for consumption or marketing, subject to conditions for disposal. Because the demand was confirmed without considering that alternative basis and the request for destruction with safeguards, the demand order was set aside and the matter remanded for fresh consideration in accordance with law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 10 May 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Jun 2011 12:22:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=117788" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1990 (5) TMI 126 - CEGAT, BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80642</link>
      <description>Excisable molasses that had solidified in storage and were claimed to be unfit for marketing or consumption had to be examined under the full excise rule, not only the proviso dealing with loss or destruction by natural causes or unavoidable accident. The rule also contained a separate proviso enabling the proper officer to decline duty where goods are unfit for consumption or marketing, subject to conditions for disposal. Because the demand was confirmed without considering that alternative basis and the request for destruction with safeguards, the demand order was set aside and the matter remanded for fresh consideration in accordance with law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 May 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80642</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>