<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1990 (4) TMI 161 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80630</link>
    <description>The Tribunal rejected all 7 applications for condonation of delay filed by M/s. Steel Authority of India Ltd. The appeals were dismissed as time-barred by limitation since the appellant failed to demonstrate sufficient cause for the delays. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of diligence and bona fides in seeking condonation of delay, stating that the discretionary power should consider relevant facts. Consequently, the appeals were dismissed without consideration of their merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Jun 2011 11:28:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=117776" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1990 (4) TMI 161 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80630</link>
      <description>The Tribunal rejected all 7 applications for condonation of delay filed by M/s. Steel Authority of India Ltd. The appeals were dismissed as time-barred by limitation since the appellant failed to demonstrate sufficient cause for the delays. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of diligence and bona fides in seeking condonation of delay, stating that the discretionary power should consider relevant facts. Consequently, the appeals were dismissed without consideration of their merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80630</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>