<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1990 (4) TMI 159 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80628</link>
    <description>The tribunal dismissed the appeals, ruling that assembling and erecting the dairy plant constituted manufacturing of excisable goods. It upheld the assessment based on the entire contract value, including bought-out items, and deemed the erected items as excisable goods subject to excise duty. The tribunal emphasized that assembling components into a new commodity falls within the definition of manufacture under the Act, in line with legal precedents and principles.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Jun 2011 11:25:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=117774" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1990 (4) TMI 159 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80628</link>
      <description>The tribunal dismissed the appeals, ruling that assembling and erecting the dairy plant constituted manufacturing of excisable goods. It upheld the assessment based on the entire contract value, including bought-out items, and deemed the erected items as excisable goods subject to excise duty. The tribunal emphasized that assembling components into a new commodity falls within the definition of manufacture under the Act, in line with legal precedents and principles.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80628</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>