<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1990 (4) TMI 156 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80625</link>
    <description>The Tribunal concluded that the imported non-ferrous forgings for synchrocones do not possess the essential character of the finished synchrocones. As a result, the forgings were classified under Tariff Heading 74.03(1) CTA, supporting M/s. TELCO Ltd.&#039;s position. TELCO&#039;s appeals were allowed, while the Revenue&#039;s appeals were dismissed, with consequential relief granted to TELCO. The cross-objections of TELCO were also resolved accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Jun 2011 11:12:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=117771" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1990 (4) TMI 156 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80625</link>
      <description>The Tribunal concluded that the imported non-ferrous forgings for synchrocones do not possess the essential character of the finished synchrocones. As a result, the forgings were classified under Tariff Heading 74.03(1) CTA, supporting M/s. TELCO Ltd.&#039;s position. TELCO&#039;s appeals were allowed, while the Revenue&#039;s appeals were dismissed, with consequential relief granted to TELCO. The cross-objections of TELCO were also resolved accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80625</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>