<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1990 (4) TMI 142 - CEGAT, BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80610</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, confirming the rejection of the claim for Rs. 59,554.00 but remanding the matter back to the adjudicating authority for further examination of the claim for Rs. 6114.28 in light of the documents provided by the appellants. The delay in filing the appeal was condoned due to misdirection on the docket of the Order-in-Appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Jun 2011 18:42:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=117756" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1990 (4) TMI 142 - CEGAT, BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80610</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, confirming the rejection of the claim for Rs. 59,554.00 but remanding the matter back to the adjudicating authority for further examination of the claim for Rs. 6114.28 in light of the documents provided by the appellants. The delay in filing the appeal was condoned due to misdirection on the docket of the Order-in-Appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80610</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>