<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1990 (4) TMI 140 - CEGAT, MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80608</link>
    <description>Aluminium cathodes used in the electrolysis process for manufacture of zinc were treated as &quot;inputs&quot; under Rule 57A because that term was construed broadly to cover goods used in or in relation to manufacture. The Tribunal applied its earlier decision in the appellant&#039;s own case and held that the cathodes participated in the manufacturing process rather than functioning as equipment. On that basis, MODVAT credit was admissible on the aluminium cathodes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Jun 2011 18:35:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=117754" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1990 (4) TMI 140 - CEGAT, MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80608</link>
      <description>Aluminium cathodes used in the electrolysis process for manufacture of zinc were treated as &quot;inputs&quot; under Rule 57A because that term was construed broadly to cover goods used in or in relation to manufacture. The Tribunal applied its earlier decision in the appellant&#039;s own case and held that the cathodes participated in the manufacturing process rather than functioning as equipment. On that basis, MODVAT credit was admissible on the aluminium cathodes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80608</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>