<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1990 (3) TMI 210 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80603</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Collector (Appeals) decision in favor of M/s. Blue Star Ltd., ruling that their imported machine qualified as a &quot;Vickers Hardness tester&quot; under Notification No. 49/78-Cus. The Tribunal emphasized that machines capable of additional functions could still be eligible for exemption, dismissing the revenue&#039;s appeal. This decision affirmed M/s. Blue Star Ltd.&#039;s entitlement to the duty exemption.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Jun 2011 18:27:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=117749" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1990 (3) TMI 210 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80603</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Collector (Appeals) decision in favor of M/s. Blue Star Ltd., ruling that their imported machine qualified as a &quot;Vickers Hardness tester&quot; under Notification No. 49/78-Cus. The Tribunal emphasized that machines capable of additional functions could still be eligible for exemption, dismissing the revenue&#039;s appeal. This decision affirmed M/s. Blue Star Ltd.&#039;s entitlement to the duty exemption.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80603</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>