<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1990 (3) TMI 205 - CEGAT, CALCUTTA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80598</link>
    <description>The Tribunal directed the transfer of the appeal to the Special Bench in New Delhi based on the interpretation of Section 35D(2) of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944. This section mandates that appeals related to questions of excise duty rates or goods&#039; valuation should be heard by a Special Bench, even if other issues are decided in the same order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 22 Mar 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Jun 2011 18:08:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=117744" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1990 (3) TMI 205 - CEGAT, CALCUTTA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80598</link>
      <description>The Tribunal directed the transfer of the appeal to the Special Bench in New Delhi based on the interpretation of Section 35D(2) of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944. This section mandates that appeals related to questions of excise duty rates or goods&#039; valuation should be heard by a Special Bench, even if other issues are decided in the same order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Mar 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80598</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>