<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1990 (3) TMI 196 - CEGAT, MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80589</link>
    <description>MODVAT credit was treated as confined to inputs used and consumed within the same factory unit for manufacture of dutiable final products. Where exempt intermediate goods, such as Alkyd Resins, were cleared without duty from one unit to another unit of the same manufacturer, the credit taken on the inputs used for those goods could not be retained or transferred. The scheme contained no provision for inter-unit transfer of MODVAT credit, and its limited exceptions, such as specified job-work removals, did not extend to these clearances. The exemption notification relied on was held inapplicable because MODVAT had to operate strictly within its own statutory framework.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 03 Mar 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Jun 2011 17:37:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=117735" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1990 (3) TMI 196 - CEGAT, MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80589</link>
      <description>MODVAT credit was treated as confined to inputs used and consumed within the same factory unit for manufacture of dutiable final products. Where exempt intermediate goods, such as Alkyd Resins, were cleared without duty from one unit to another unit of the same manufacturer, the credit taken on the inputs used for those goods could not be retained or transferred. The scheme contained no provision for inter-unit transfer of MODVAT credit, and its limited exceptions, such as specified job-work removals, did not extend to these clearances. The exemption notification relied on was held inapplicable because MODVAT had to operate strictly within its own statutory framework.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 03 Mar 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80589</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>