<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1990 (1) TMI 215 - CEGAT, BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80574</link>
    <description>Chemicals used to prepare sand moulds were treated as inputs used in equipment or apparatus for manufacture, so they fell within the exclusion in the explanation to Rule 57A and did not qualify for Modvat credit. The note also rejects the alternative argument under Rule 57D, stating that the moulds were separately manufactured and used for casting, rather than arising as intermediate products in the course of making the castings. The point whether the moulds were marketable or finished excisable goods was treated as immaterial to that controversy. On that reasoning, the demand was sustained and the assessee&#039;s claim failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Jun 2011 16:56:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=117720" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1990 (1) TMI 215 - CEGAT, BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80574</link>
      <description>Chemicals used to prepare sand moulds were treated as inputs used in equipment or apparatus for manufacture, so they fell within the exclusion in the explanation to Rule 57A and did not qualify for Modvat credit. The note also rejects the alternative argument under Rule 57D, stating that the moulds were separately manufactured and used for casting, rather than arising as intermediate products in the course of making the castings. The point whether the moulds were marketable or finished excisable goods was treated as immaterial to that controversy. On that reasoning, the demand was sustained and the assessee&#039;s claim failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80574</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>