https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80573 The Tribunal dismissed the application for condonation of delay in filing an appeal, leading to the dismissal of the appeal itself. Despite citing delays in receiving the appeal order and corresponding with Customs authorities, the applicant failed to sufficiently justify the delay from November 1987 to January 1989. The Tribunal emphasized the need for the applicant to demonstrate a satisfactory explanation for the delay, ultimately ruling that the delay was not adequately justified. The decision underscored the importance of proving sufficient cause in condonation of delay cases. en-us Fri, 29 Jun 1990 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 17 Jun 2011 16:55:25 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80573 The Tribunal dismissed the application for condonation of delay in filing an appeal, leading to the dismissal of the appeal itself. Despite citing delays in receiving the appeal order and corresponding with Customs authorities, the applicant failed to sufficiently justify the delay from November 1987 to January 1989. The Tribunal emphasized the need for the applicant to demonstrate a satisfactory explanation for the delay, ultimately ruling that the delay was not adequately justified. The decision underscored the importance of proving sufficient cause in condonation of delay cases. Case-Laws Customs Fri, 29 Jun 1990 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80573