https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80552 A pre-deposit condition under section 35F, once effectively affirmed by the Supreme Court, could not be reopened before the Tribunal on the same grounds. The Tribunal held that a fresh request to modify the stay order was barred where the asserted factual basis was not genuinely new and had already been raised earlier. Persistent failure to comply with the pre-deposit direction, despite repeated opportunities and waiver applications, justified dismissal of the appeal for non-compliance with the stay order. The operative principle was that continued disregard of an affirmed condition binds the appellant and attracts dismissal. en-us Mon, 14 May 1990 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 17 Jun 2011 15:58:26 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80552 A pre-deposit condition under section 35F, once effectively affirmed by the Supreme Court, could not be reopened before the Tribunal on the same grounds. The Tribunal held that a fresh request to modify the stay order was barred where the asserted factual basis was not genuinely new and had already been raised earlier. Persistent failure to comply with the pre-deposit direction, despite repeated opportunities and waiver applications, justified dismissal of the appeal for non-compliance with the stay order. The operative principle was that continued disregard of an affirmed condition binds the appellant and attracts dismissal. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 14 May 1990 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80552