<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1990 (5) TMI 110 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80550</link>
    <description>The tribunal, after considering the circumstances, decided to condone the delay in filing the appeal and remanded the matter to the Collector (Appeals) for a decision on the merits. A corrigendum was issued to rectify the previous order and emphasize adherence to procedural requirements and principles of justice.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 May 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Jun 2011 15:55:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=117696" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1990 (5) TMI 110 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80550</link>
      <description>The tribunal, after considering the circumstances, decided to condone the delay in filing the appeal and remanded the matter to the Collector (Appeals) for a decision on the merits. A corrigendum was issued to rectify the previous order and emphasize adherence to procedural requirements and principles of justice.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 May 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80550</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>