<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1990 (3) TMI 175 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80508</link>
    <description>Cess under the Vegetable Oil Cess Act, 1983 was chargeable from the notified commencement date because the charging provision operated on the taxable event itself; later constitution of the Board was only an administrative arrangement and did not postpone liability. The objection that cess could not be levied for the earlier period was rejected. The argument based on Form-A also failed because the return machinery covered vegetable oil production from oil seeds, and the absence of a separate column for the appellants&#039; precise production method did not affect the incidence of levy. The cess remained payable and the appeals were rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 12 Mar 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Jun 2011 13:21:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=117654" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1990 (3) TMI 175 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80508</link>
      <description>Cess under the Vegetable Oil Cess Act, 1983 was chargeable from the notified commencement date because the charging provision operated on the taxable event itself; later constitution of the Board was only an administrative arrangement and did not postpone liability. The objection that cess could not be levied for the earlier period was rejected. The argument based on Form-A also failed because the return machinery covered vegetable oil production from oil seeds, and the absence of a separate column for the appellants&#039; precise production method did not affect the incidence of levy. The cess remained payable and the appeals were rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Mar 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80508</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>