https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80501 The Appellate Tribunal allowed the application for condonation of delay in filing a Stay Petition and appeal due to the attorney's absence for his father-in-law's treatment and the advocate's negligence in misplacing papers. The Tribunal considered the circumstances and emphasized the liberal construction of "sufficient cause" to advance substantial justice. It held that the applicants demonstrated sufficient cause for the delay, and the Stay Petition was scheduled for a hearing on 25th April, 1990. en-us Thu, 22 Feb 1990 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 17 Jun 2011 12:57:10 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80501 The Appellate Tribunal allowed the application for condonation of delay in filing a Stay Petition and appeal due to the attorney's absence for his father-in-law's treatment and the advocate's negligence in misplacing papers. The Tribunal considered the circumstances and emphasized the liberal construction of "sufficient cause" to advance substantial justice. It held that the applicants demonstrated sufficient cause for the delay, and the Stay Petition was scheduled for a hearing on 25th April, 1990. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 22 Feb 1990 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80501